Trademark: RESOLVE
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for RESOLVE
We do not have any records of a proof of use for RESOLVE at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of RESOLVE
Basic Information about RESOLVE
- Serial Number
- 75777432
- Filing Date
- 17 Aug 1999
- Registration Number
- 2440185
- Registration Date
- 03 Apr 2001
- Mark Drawing Code
- 1
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of RESOLVE on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of RESOLVE anywhere
- RESOLVE was first used on 31 Dec 1977 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 016 (Paper goods and printed matter)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 016
- US Codes
- 002; 005; 022; 023; 029; 037; 038; 050
- First use of RESOLVE anywhere
- RESOLVE was first used on 31 Dec 1977 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 041 (Education and entertainment)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 041
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 107
- First use of RESOLVE anywhere
- RESOLVE was first used on 31 Dec 1977 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 042 (Computer, scientific & legal)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 042
- US Codes
- 100; 101
Who owns RESOLVE?
Correspondent
- Brian Coleman
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
- Suite 1100
- 1500 K Street, NW
Recent News about RESOLVE
Law School Amici Urge SCOTUS to Grant Kroger Petition on Trademark Confusion and Resolve Circuit Conflict Tweet this
The USPTO and the USCO Must Resolve Their Disparate Approaches to AI Inventorship and Copyrightability Tweet this
BNB Chain and MetaMask Resolve Glitch Affecting opBNB Gas Fees Tweet this
In Plastipak Decision, CAFC Fails to Resolve Precedential Inconsistency in Inventorship Determination Tweet this
Google to pay $9.5 million to resolve Washington DC location tracking suit Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io