Trademark: EVIDENCE
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for EVIDENCE
We do not have any records of a proof of use for EVIDENCE at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of EVIDENCE
Basic Information about EVIDENCE
- Serial Number
- 75983219
- Filing Date
- 04 May 1999
- Registration Number
- 2852295
- Registration Date
- 15 Jun 2004
- Mark Drawing Code
- 5
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of EVIDENCE on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of EVIDENCE anywhere
- EVIDENCE was first used on 28 Aug 2002 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 009 (Electrical and scientific apparatus)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 009
- US Codes
- 021; 023; 026; 036; 038
- First use of EVIDENCE anywhere
- EVIDENCE was first used on 28 Aug 2002 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 010 (Medical Apparatus)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 010
- US Codes
- 026; 039; 044
Who owns EVIDENCE?
1. Randox Laboratories Limited Crumlin, Antrim
2. Randox Laboratories Limited Co. Antrim
3. Randox Laboratories Limited Co. Antrim
Correspondent
- Richard J. Groos
- Fulbright & Jaworski LLP
- Suite 1100
- 98 San Jacinto Boulevard
Recent News about EVIDENCE
Other Barks & Bites for Wednesday, November 27: OpenAI Rebukes Deleted Evidence Accusations; Netlist Awarded $118 Million in Patent Infringement Lawsuit with Samsung; Report Finds Music Copyright Business is in Boom Time Tweet this
New Evidence Suggests VP Harris Could Escalate Biden’s Crypto Crackdown, Expert Warns Tweet this
Evidence of Greater Traditional Finance Participation in Bitcoin Tweet this
CAFC Orders Review of Extrinsic Evidence to Determine Proper Limit of Claimed pH Range Tweet this
Vidal Wants Input on Proper Sanctions for Withholding Evidence from PTAB Tweet this
Caroline Ellison's Diaries: Crucial Evidence in FTX's SBF Trial Tweet this
Evidence of Bad Faith Leads Fourth Circuit to Affirm Disgorgement and Attorneys’ Fees in Trademark Case Tweet this
Recent Evidence Raises Questions on Efforts to Silence Dissent at the Federal Circuit Tweet this
Acquired distinctiveness: flooring objections to evidence of use in Singapore Tweet this
EU: General Court holding UK evidence to be irrelevant post-Brexit: disagreement with earlier General Court decision(s) Tweet this
Presenting the Evidence for Patent Eligibility Reform: Part IV – Uncertainty is Burdening Litigants and Courts, Threatening U.S. Competitiveness and National Security Tweet this
Website printouts’ value as evidence of use of a trademark in India Tweet this
Presenting the Evidence for Patent Eligibility Reform: Part II – Harm to R&D Investment, Innovation and U.S. Interests Tweet this
High Court of Delhi confirms Internet-downloaded evidence is admissible Tweet this
Presenting the Evidence for Patent Eligibility Reform: Part I – Consensus from Patent Law Experts Tweet this
James Webb captures evidence of carbon dioxide in distant planet's atmosphere Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 12: Canada to Add Resale Royalties to Copyright Law, Fifth Circuit Affirms Exclusion of Evidence in ‘Call of Duty’ Copyright Suit, and Ninth Circuit Rejects Trademark Appeal in Yoga Pants Case Tweet this
Mossoff-Barnett Comment on EU Commission’s Call for SEP Evidence Spotlights Misconceptions About FRAND Obligations Tweet this
Carefully Connecting the Dots: Consider All the Evidence Before Launching a Trade Secret Misappropriation Attack Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io