Trademark: SUPREME
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for SUPREME
We do not have any records of a proof of use for SUPREME at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of SUPREME
Basic Information about SUPREME
- Serial Number
- 76708002
- Filing Date
- 15 Jun 2011
- Registration Number
- 4094910
- Registration Date
- 07 Feb 2012
- Mark Drawing Code
- 3
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of SUPREME on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of SUPREME anywhere
- SUPREME was first used on 01 Jan 1997 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 005 (Pharmaceuticals)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 005
- US Codes
- 006; 018; 044; 046; 051; 052
Who owns SUPREME?
1. Grand Stone Corporation ORANGE CA
2. Grand Stone Corporation Orange CA
3. Grand Stone Corporation Orange CA
Correspondent
- Grand Stone Corporation
- 500 N. State College Blvd., Suite 1100
- ORANGE CA 92868
Recent News about SUPREME
INTA files amicus brief urging Supreme Court to clarify limits on disgorgement of profits under Lanham Act Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 23: Music Publishers Petition Supreme Court to Review Overturned $1 Billion Copyright Infringement Judgment; Nike Continues Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against ‘Shoe Surgeon’ Tweet this
Supreme Court Grants Real Estate Company’s Trademark Petition Challenging Profits Award Based on Affiliates’ Earnings Tweet this
UK Supreme Court hands directors IP infringement reprieve Tweet this
Back When the Supreme Court Got It Right On IP: Kewanee, 50 Years Later Tweet this
Other Barks and Bites for Friday, May 10: Bipartisan Congress Members Call for GAO Study on March-In Proposal; USPTO Warns Trademark Applicants of Data Leak; Supreme Court Rejects Time Limit on Copyright Damages Tweet this
Trademark owners under scrutiny of the Supreme Court: a review Tweet this
Newman’s Counsel Says Supreme Court’s Agreement with Her Dissent Proves Mental Fitness Tweet this
The Supreme Court rules Amazon did target UK customers with non-UK websites Tweet this
Rader’s Ruminations – Patent Eligibility II: How the Supreme Court Ignored Statute and Revived Its Innovation-Killing Two-Step Tweet this
Greece – Supreme Court – distinctiveness and functionality of shape marks Tweet this
Supreme Court Denies Five IP Petitions on Issues from IPR Joinder to Contributory Trademark Infringement Tweet this
AI in the Dock: B.C. Supreme Court Tackles Fabricated Legal Cases Tweet this
The UK Supreme Court DABUS Decision: The End or Just a Bump in the Road for AI Inventors? Tweet this
The Supreme Court has Rejected Apple's Appeal in an Antitrust case that will affect Apple's lucrative App Store business Tweet this
UK Supreme Court Dismisses DABUS as Inventor Tweet this
Denmark: The Supreme Court finds no infringement of the “TREK” trademark Tweet this
IP at the Top: What the Supreme Court’s 2023 IP Rulings Mean for Practice Tweet this
Laser Lessons: Has the Supreme Court Undermined Pioneering Laser Patents? Tweet this
Supreme Court Again Denies Inventor’s Bid to End Alice/Mayo Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io