WikiTrademarks - Search, analyse, and monitor trademark applications.

Serial Number

77672441

Filing Date

17 Feb 2009

Registration Number

3804210

Registration Date

15 Jun 2010

Mark Drawing Code

3

Classifications

Declare the trademark use of V on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.

First use of V anywhere

V was first used on 20 Mar 2009 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 010 (Medical Apparatus)

First use in commerce

There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.

Status Code

2

International Code

010

US Codes

026; 039; 044

David L. King

5131 NE County Road 340

High Springs, FL 32643

UNITED STATES

Lawyers weigh in on quality v speed debate for IP judgments Tweet this

Counsel mull remand likelihood after Dewberry v Dewberry arguments Tweet this

Breaking: UK Supreme Court issues ‘bad faith’ finding in Sky v SkyKick Tweet this

UK Supreme Court sets date for Sky v SkyKick ruling Tweet this

Weekly take: It’s all square on IP in Harris v Trump Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco: Lessons to be learned Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco – evergreening and non-use revocation Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco: The Court of Appeal reverses copyright infringement decision Tweet this

Behind the case: UK judges provide food for thought in Lidl v Tesco Tweet this

Weekly take: Lidl v Tesco should prompt High Court TM rethink Tweet this

Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’ Tweet this

A rare Zambian trademark judgment: ‘Oreo’ v ‘Moreo’s’ Tweet this

Meme Battle: Frogs v Dogs Pepe Coin (PEPE) & (BONK) Price Action Tweet this

Acer Debuts New Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop Tweet this

This week on MIP: Panasonic v Xiaomi, Tupac copyright row Tweet this

Gemini v Genesis: The Winklevii Crypto Exchange Sues Over $1.6 Billion in GBTC Collateral Tweet this

This week on MIP: UPC hires, CoStar v Crexi latest Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco- We need to talk about Copyright Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco: To injunct or not to injunct? Tweet this

Sky v SkyKick reaches UK Supreme Court endgame Tweet this

Log in to edit this.