Trademark: V
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for V
We do not have any records of a proof of use for V at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of V
Basic Information about V
- Serial Number
- 77694177
- Filing Date
- 18 Mar 2009
- Registration Number
- 3692145
- Registration Date
- 06 Oct 2009
- Mark Drawing Code
- 3
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of V on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of V anywhere
- V was first used on 16 Sep 2008 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 041 (Education and entertainment)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 041
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 107
- First use of V anywhere
- V was first used on 16 Sep 2008 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 043 (Hotels and Restaurants)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 043
- US Codes
- 100; 101
Who owns V?
1. MATADOR LAND & CATTLE CO., LLC LUBBOCK TX
2. MATADOR CATTLE COMPANY, LLC Wichita KS
3. MATADOR CATTLE COMPANY WICHITA KS
4. KOCH AGRICULTURE COMPANY WICHITA KS
5. KOCH AGRICULTURE COMPANY WICHITA KS
6. KOCH AGRICULTURE COMPANY WICHITA KS
Correspondent
- Sarah Hegi Simpson
- Simpson Trademark Law, PLLC
- 3410 98th ST, STE 4 #315
- Lubbock TX 79423
Recent News about V
Breaking: UK Supreme Court issues ‘bad faith’ finding in Sky v SkyKick Tweet this
UK Supreme Court sets date for Sky v SkyKick ruling Tweet this
Weekly take: It’s all square on IP in Harris v Trump Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: Lessons to be learned Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco – evergreening and non-use revocation Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: The Court of Appeal reverses copyright infringement decision Tweet this
Behind the case: UK judges provide food for thought in Lidl v Tesco Tweet this
Weekly take: Lidl v Tesco should prompt High Court TM rethink Tweet this
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’ Tweet this
A rare Zambian trademark judgment: ‘Oreo’ v ‘Moreo’s’ Tweet this
Meme Battle: Frogs v Dogs Pepe Coin (PEPE) & (BONK) Price Action Tweet this
Acer Debuts New Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop Tweet this
This week on MIP: Panasonic v Xiaomi, Tupac copyright row Tweet this
Gemini v Genesis: The Winklevii Crypto Exchange Sues Over $1.6 Billion in GBTC Collateral Tweet this
This week on MIP: UPC hires, CoStar v Crexi latest Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco- We need to talk about Copyright Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: To injunct or not to injunct? Tweet this
Sky v SkyKick reaches UK Supreme Court endgame Tweet this
This week on MIP: Oppo v Nokia clash, UPC shake-up Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io