Trademark: COURTS
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for COURTS
We do not have any records of a proof of use for COURTS at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of COURTS
Basic Information about COURTS
- Serial Number
- 78735693
- Filing Date
- 18 Oct 2005
- Registration Number
- 3999198
- Registration Date
- 19 Jul 2011
- Mark Drawing Code
- 3
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of COURTS on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of COURTS anywhere
- COURTS was first used on 31 Dec 2009 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 035 (Advertising and business)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 035
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 102
- First use of COURTS anywhere
- COURTS was first used on 31 Dec 2009 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 036 (Insurance and financial)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 036
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 102
Who owns COURTS?
1. FACILITO OVERSEAS HOLDING CORP. URBANIZACION OBARRIO
2. Facilito Overseas Holding Co. Ltd. Tortola
3. Facilito Overseas Holding Co. Ltd. Tortola
4. Facilito Overseas Holding Co. Ltd. Tortola
Correspondent
- David D. Rodrigues
- GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN P.C.
- 270 MADISON AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR
- NEW YORK NY 10016-0601
Recent News about COURTS
Amici Back Island IP’s Argument That Federal Courts Are Improperly Using Procedural Rules Tweet this
Inventors Group to U.S. Courts Committee: Don’t be Duped by Corporate Call for Litigation Funding Transparency Tweet this
How the UPC Courts Have Ruled on Security/ Bonds for Initiating Actions Tweet this
How U.S. Courts Ruled on Trademarks in 2023 Tweet this
AI is Not Creative Per the USCO and the Courts – And That’s a Good Thing Tweet this
Bitcoin Critique: ‘Black Swan’ Author Courts Controversy With Provocative Take Tweet this
CJEU rules on the procedural autonomy of national courts acting as EU trade mark courts Tweet this
Solicitor General to SCOTUS: Courts Got it Wrong in Interactive Wearables, Right in Tropp—But Both Petitions Should be Granted Tweet this
Chinese courts adopting an ‘anti-squatter’ stance on trademark use for export-only goods Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January, 13: Marjorie Taylor Greene Removes Video after Cease-and-Desist Letter from Dr. Dre; Computer Scientist Asks Courts for Copyright on AI-Generated Art; and Adidas Loses Case Over Three-Stripe Trademark Tweet this
Counsel urge national courts to capitalise on CJEU Louboutin ruling Tweet this
How the Unified Patent Court Will Shake Up the Landscape of Patent Courts Worldwide Tweet this
With Congress and Courts at Standstill, IPWatchdog LIVE 2022 Panel Says Upcoming ‘Action’ on 101 Will Be at USPTO Tweet this
IP owners urge UK courts to consider ‘shopper science’ Tweet this
INTA proposes clear definition for when courts should apply the rogers analysis Tweet this
Senators Take Aim at Chinese Anti-Suit Injunctions with ‘Defending American Courts Act’ Tweet this
Taiwan’s courts assess whether Rimowa’s groove design is protectable under the Fair Trade Act Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io