Trademark: IPR
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for IPR
We do not have any records of a proof of use for IPR at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of IPR
Basic Information about IPR
- Serial Number
- 85035302
- Filing Date
- 11 May 2010
- Registration Number
- 3897167
- Registration Date
- 28 Dec 2010
- Mark Drawing Code
- 3
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of IPR on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of IPR anywhere
- IPR was first used on 31 Jan 2010 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 037 (Building construction and repair)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 037
- US Codes
- 100; 103; 106
Who owns IPR?
1. PURIS LLC CONYERS GA
2. Inland Pipe Rehabilitation LLC Conyers GA
3. Inland Pipe Rehabilitation LLC The Woodlands TX
4. Inland Pipe Rehabilitation LLC The Woodlands TX
Correspondent
- Jeremy D. Bisdorf Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- 27777 FRANKLIN RD.
- SUITE 2500
- SOUTHFIELD, MI 48034
Recent News about IPR
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, July 26: New Group Registration for Frequently Updated News Websites, Trade Secret Claims Against TikTok Survive Dismissal, and USPTO’s Estoppel Provisions in IPR Proceedings Upheld Tweet this
Supreme Court Denies Five IP Petitions on Issues from IPR Joinder to Contributory Trademark Infringement Tweet this
Split Federal Circuit Panel Says Netflix Failed to Properly Raise Arguments in IPR Petition Tweet this
CAFC Finds No Violation of IPR Reply Restrictions in Apple’s Expansion of Analogous Art Arguments Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 1: Sisvel Appeal to CAFC Fails in Precedential Ruling; OpenAI Files Motion to Dismiss Parts of Copyright Infringement Lawsuits; Report Claims IPR Changes Could Damage U.S. Economy Tweet this
Google Tells USPTO Proposed IPR Changes Would Stifle AI Innovation Tweet this
Five Tips for IPR Practice Following the Federal Circuit’s Decisions in Medtronic v. Teleflex Tweet this
Solicitor General Tells SCOTUS to Reject Apple’s Bid to Skirt IPR Estoppel Tweet this
PTAB Sanctions Patent Owner for Abusing IPR Process, Cancels All Claims Challenged by COVID Testing Device Maker Tweet this
SCOTUS Petition Challenges Federal Circuit’s Estoppel Ruling Against Claims Removed from IPR by Pre-SAS Partial Institution Tweet this
High Court Asks for SG Views on Apple’s Petition Challenging Federal Circuit Approach to IPR Estoppel Tweet this
PTAB Judge Who Owns Cisco Stock Withdraws from IPR Following Centripetal Claims of Bias Tweet this
CAFC Expressly States Patentee Disclaimers During IPR are Not Binding on the PTAB’s Patentability Analysis Tweet this
SCOTUS Week in Review: Cert Denied in Cases Challenging Fairness of IPR Institutions, Application of Alice/Mayo; SG Briefing Requested in Teva’s ‘Skinny Label’ Case Tweet this
Vidal Bans OpenSky from VLSI IPR in Precedential Director Review Decision Tweet this
CAFC Says Failure to Appeal Examiner Cancellation Mooted Appeal of IPR Obviousness Findings Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 14: Property Rights Groups Oppose SEP Draft Policy Statement, PTAB POP Issues Ruling on Wire Transfer of IPR Filing Fee, and SCOTUS Denies Appeal in Breach of Royalty Agreement Case Tweet this
Patent Filings Round-up: IPR on $2.18 Billion VLSI Patent Instituted; IP Edge Filing Patterns Emerge Tweet this
B.E. Technology Dubs IPR Process a ‘Kafkaesque Nightmare’ in Mandamus Petition to CAFC Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, October 8: Tillis Sends Letter to USTR on TRIPS Waiver for Copyright, SCOTUS Seeks Solicitor General Brief on PersonalWeb’s Cert Petition, and CAFC Rules NDA Forum Selection Clause Doesn’t Preclude IPR Petitions Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io