Trademark: VERDICT
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for VERDICT
We do not have any records of a proof of use for VERDICT at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of VERDICT
Basic Information about VERDICT
- Serial Number
- 85186979
- Filing Date
- 30 Nov 2010
- Registration Number
- 4170013
- Registration Date
- 10 Jul 2012
- Mark Drawing Code
- 4
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of VERDICT on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of VERDICT anywhere
- VERDICT was first used on 20 Aug 2010 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 009 (Electrical and scientific apparatus)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 009
- US Codes
- 021; 023; 026; 036; 038
Who owns VERDICT?
1. Snap-on Incorporated Kenosha WI
2. Snap-on Incorporated Kenosha WI
3. Snap-on Incorporated Kenosha WI
Correspondent
- Gina L. Durham, Esq.
- DLA PIPER LLP (US)
- PO BOX 64807
- CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807
Recent News about VERDICT
Chip designer Arm will seek a retrial with Qualcomm as the Judge pushed for a verdict after the jury claimed they were at an Impasse Tweet this
MetaBirkin NFT verdict boosts trademark counsel confidence Tweet this
Ripple vs. SEC Verdict Likely As Hinman Docs Not So Important? Lawyers Argue Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, November 18: Canada’s Supreme Court Affirms ‘Springboard’ Profits Award for Dow, VLSI Wins Another Massive Verdict Against Intel, and Ninth Circuit Says Director Service Applies to Court Proceedings Tweet this
Federal Circuit Delivers Amazon a Win, Vacating Jury Verdict that Echo Induced Infringement Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 4: Judge Michel Urges SCOTUS to Fix Section 101, CAFC Puts Appellate Bar on Notice of Sanctions for COVID-19 Protocol Violations, and Fifth Circuit Modifies Verdict on Trade Secret Misappropriation Tweet this
CAFC Clarifies Willful Infringement Standard, Reinstating Jury Verdict and Enhanced Damages for SRI International Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 27: Tenth Circuit Sides with First on Lanham Act’s Extraterritoriality, CAFC Overturns $1.2 Billion Verdict in Cancer Immunotherapy Case, and Ninth Circuit Says No Public Performance Rights in CA Copyright Law Tweet this
CAFC Reverses Massive Jury Verdict for Juno and Sloan Kettering Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io