Trademark: CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE
Click here to search for trademarks similar to CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE
Proof of use for CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE
We do not have any records of a proof of use for CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE at this moment.
Click here to add a proof of use for CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE
Possible trademark infringements of CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE
Basic Information about CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE
- Serial Number
- 85429209
- Filing Date
- 22 Sep 2011
- Registration Number
- 4466888
- Registration Date
- 14 Jan 2014
- Mark Drawing Code
- 4
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE anywhere
- CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE was first used on 01 Oct 2013 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 030 (Staple foods)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 030
- US Codes
- 046
Who owns CLEARLY WHAT SPICES SHOULD BE?
1. Morton Bassett, LP Rohnert Park CA
2. Morton Bassett, LP Novato CA
3. Morton Bassett, LP Novato CA
Correspondent
- Raffi V. Zerounian
- Hanson Bridgett LLP
- 425 Market Street, 26th Floor
- San Francisco CA 94105
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io