WikiTrademarks - Search, analyse, and monitor trademark applications.

Serial Number

85845834

Filing Date

11 Feb 2013

Registration Number

4414020

Registration Date

08 Oct 2013

Mark Drawing Code

3

Classifications

Declare the trademark use of V on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.

First use of V anywhere

V was first used on 25 Jan 2012 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 044 (Medical, beauty & agricultural)

First use in commerce

There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.

Status Code

6

International Code

044

US Codes

100; 101

Kathryn Starshak

K&L GATES LLP

P.O. Box 1135

Chicago, IL 60690-1135

Lawyers weigh in on quality v speed debate for IP judgments Tweet this

Counsel mull remand likelihood after Dewberry v Dewberry arguments Tweet this

Breaking: UK Supreme Court issues ‘bad faith’ finding in Sky v SkyKick Tweet this

UK Supreme Court sets date for Sky v SkyKick ruling Tweet this

Weekly take: It’s all square on IP in Harris v Trump Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco: Lessons to be learned Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco – evergreening and non-use revocation Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco: The Court of Appeal reverses copyright infringement decision Tweet this

Behind the case: UK judges provide food for thought in Lidl v Tesco Tweet this

Weekly take: Lidl v Tesco should prompt High Court TM rethink Tweet this

Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’ Tweet this

A rare Zambian trademark judgment: ‘Oreo’ v ‘Moreo’s’ Tweet this

Meme Battle: Frogs v Dogs Pepe Coin (PEPE) & (BONK) Price Action Tweet this

Acer Debuts New Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop Tweet this

This week on MIP: Panasonic v Xiaomi, Tupac copyright row Tweet this

Gemini v Genesis: The Winklevii Crypto Exchange Sues Over $1.6 Billion in GBTC Collateral Tweet this

This week on MIP: UPC hires, CoStar v Crexi latest Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco- We need to talk about Copyright Tweet this

Lidl v Tesco: To injunct or not to injunct? Tweet this

Sky v SkyKick reaches UK Supreme Court endgame Tweet this

Log in to edit this.