WikiTrademarks - Search, analyse, and monitor trademark applications.

Serial Number

85906317

Filing Date

17 Apr 2013

Registration Number

4539924

Registration Date

27 May 2014

Mark Drawing Code

4

Classifications

Declare the trademark use of V. on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.

First use of V. anywhere

V. was first used on 01 Oct 2011 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 016 (Paper goods and printed matter)

First use in commerce

There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.

Status Code

2

International Code

016

US Codes

002; 005; 022; 023; 029; 037; 038; 050

First use of V. anywhere

V. was first used on 01 Oct 2011 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 025 (Clothing)

First use in commerce

There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.

Status Code

2

International Code

025

US Codes

022; 039

TRAGIC KISS

TRAGIC KISS

PO BOX 200266

AUSTIN TX 78720-0266

Battle of the brands: Easyfundraising v. EasyGroup Tweet this

Listening in on an EU perspective: Bruno Mars v. Miley Cyrus (Flowers) Tweet this

Trademark case: Avco Corp. v. Turn and Bank Holdings, LLC, USA Tweet this

Trademark case: Artoss, Inc. v. Artoss Gmbh, USA Tweet this

Starbucks v. Starbuds: trademark battle? Tweet this

Trademark case: Appliance Liquidation Outlet, L.L.C. v. Axis Supply Corp, USA Tweet this

Trademark case: Bacardi & Co. Ltd. v. USPTO, USA Tweet this

Call Off Chicken Little: The Sky is Not Falling for Skinny Labeling After GSK v. Teva Tweet this

Nike v. Adidas: not all stripes are the same Tweet this

Vans v. FCB Garment Tex: balancing fame and fairness Tweet this

Trademark case: House v. Player’s Dugout, Inc., USA Tweet this

Iconix v. Dream Pairs: logo on football boots ‘confusingly similar’ to Umbro logo Tweet this

Tesla v. Tesla Power India: Tesla files lawsuit in Delhi High Court Tweet this

Implications of Chanel v. WGACA for luxury resale market Tweet this

Lidl v. Tesco: Supermarket Wars in Court Tweet this

Nike v. BAPE: a clash of the Titans in sneaker trade dress Tweet this

Rolex v. AGSA: are customization activities of branded watches a world of wonders? Tweet this

Penn State v. Vintage Brand: “throwback” clothing company uses Penn State’s trademarks Tweet this

M&S v. Aldi: a ‘refreshing’ reminder of the benefits of design protection Tweet this

After Weber v. Provisur, Confidentiality Provisions May Not Be Sufficient to Protect Your Documents from Being Prior Art Tweet this

Log in to edit this.