WikiTrademarks - Search, analyse, and monitor trademark applications.

Trademark: LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T

Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io

Tweet this

Track updates on LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T

Mark Identification

Proof of use for LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T

We do not have any records of a proof of use for LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T at this moment.

Click here to add a proof of use for LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T

Possible trademark infringements of LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T

Basic Information about LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T

Serial Number
86248936
Filing Date
10 Apr 2014
Registration Number
4637150
Registration Date
11 Nov 2014
Mark Drawing Code
4

Classifications

Declare the trademark use of LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.

First use of LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T anywhere
LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T was first used on 25 May 2010 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 035 (Advertising and business)
First use in commerce
There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
Status Code
6
International Code
035
US Codes
100; 101; 102

Who owns LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T?

1. Hugh M. Metheny New Market MD

2. Hugh M. Metheny New Market MD

3. Hugh M. Metheny New Market MD

Correspondent

Hugh M. Metheny
10568 EDWARDIAN LN
10568 Edwardian Lane
NEW MARKET MD 21774

Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io

Tweet this

Track updates on LOOKS EXPENSIVE BUT IT ISN'T