Trademark: V
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for V
We do not have any records of a proof of use for V at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of V
Basic Information about V
- Serial Number
- 87252714
- Filing Date
- 30 Nov 2016
- Registration Number
- 6211360
- Registration Date
- 01 Dec 2020
- Mark Drawing Code
- 3
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of V on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of V anywhere
- V was first used on 15 Oct 2020 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 025 (Clothing)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 025
- US Codes
- 022; 039
- First use of V anywhere
- V was first used on 10 Oct 2016 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 035 (Advertising and business)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 035
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 102
- First use of V anywhere
- V was first used on 10 Oct 2016 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 044 (Medical, beauty & agricultural)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 044
- US Codes
- 100; 101
Who owns V?
1. FLRISH IP, LLC Oakland CA
2. FLRISH IP, LLC Oakland CA
3. OOTS, LLC OAKLAND CA
4. Patients Mutual Assistance Collective Corporation Oakland CA
5. Patients Mutual Assistance Collective Corporation Oakland CA
Correspondent
- Mary L. Shapiro Evoke Law, PC
- 201 Spear Street, Suite 1100, #16
- San Francisco, CA 94105
- United States
Recent News about V
Lidl v Tesco: Lessons to be learned Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco – evergreening and non-use revocation Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: The Court of Appeal reverses copyright infringement decision Tweet this
Behind the case: UK judges provide food for thought in Lidl v Tesco Tweet this
Weekly take: Lidl v Tesco should prompt High Court TM rethink Tweet this
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’ Tweet this
A rare Zambian trademark judgment: ‘Oreo’ v ‘Moreo’s’ Tweet this
Meme Battle: Frogs v Dogs Pepe Coin (PEPE) & (BONK) Price Action Tweet this
Acer Debuts New Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop Tweet this
This week on MIP: Panasonic v Xiaomi, Tupac copyright row Tweet this
Gemini v Genesis: The Winklevii Crypto Exchange Sues Over $1.6 Billion in GBTC Collateral Tweet this
This week on MIP: UPC hires, CoStar v Crexi latest Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco- We need to talk about Copyright Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: To injunct or not to injunct? Tweet this
Sky v SkyKick reaches UK Supreme Court endgame Tweet this
This week on MIP: Oppo v Nokia clash, UPC shake-up Tweet this
This week on MIP: France v EPO spat, Med-El loss Tweet this
Copyright claims up in flames: Evans v John Lewis PLC and Another Tweet this
Trademark tussle: Google LLC v Google Enterprises (P) Ltd. Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io