Trademark: V
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for V
We do not have any records of a proof of use for V at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of V
Basic Information about V
- Serial Number
- 87476179
- Filing Date
- 05 Jun 2017
- Registration Number
- 6088044
- Registration Date
- 30 Jun 2020
- Mark Drawing Code
- 5
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of V on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of V anywhere
- No first use declared yet.
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 003
- US Codes
- 001; 004; 006; 050; 051; 052
- First use of V anywhere
- No first use declared yet.
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 008
- US Codes
- 023; 028; 044
- First use of V anywhere
- No first use declared yet.
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 035
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 102
- First use of V anywhere
- No first use declared yet.
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 044
- US Codes
- 100; 101
Who owns V?
1. VELOUR COSMETICS INC. Toronto, Ontario
2. VELOUR COSMETICS INC. TORONTO, ONTARIO
3. Velour Lashes IP Holdings Inc. Toronto, Ontario
4. Velour Lashes IP Holdings Inc. Toronto, Ontario
5. Velour Lashes IP Holdings Inc. Toronto, Ontario
Correspondent
- Annie Allison
- Haynes and Boone LLP
- 30 Rockefeller Plaza, 26th Floor
- New York NY 10112
Recent News about V
UK Supreme Court sets date for Sky v SkyKick ruling Tweet this
Weekly take: It’s all square on IP in Harris v Trump Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: Lessons to be learned Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco – evergreening and non-use revocation Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: The Court of Appeal reverses copyright infringement decision Tweet this
Behind the case: UK judges provide food for thought in Lidl v Tesco Tweet this
Weekly take: Lidl v Tesco should prompt High Court TM rethink Tweet this
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’ Tweet this
A rare Zambian trademark judgment: ‘Oreo’ v ‘Moreo’s’ Tweet this
Meme Battle: Frogs v Dogs Pepe Coin (PEPE) & (BONK) Price Action Tweet this
Acer Debuts New Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop Tweet this
This week on MIP: Panasonic v Xiaomi, Tupac copyright row Tweet this
Gemini v Genesis: The Winklevii Crypto Exchange Sues Over $1.6 Billion in GBTC Collateral Tweet this
This week on MIP: UPC hires, CoStar v Crexi latest Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco- We need to talk about Copyright Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: To injunct or not to injunct? Tweet this
Sky v SkyKick reaches UK Supreme Court endgame Tweet this
This week on MIP: Oppo v Nokia clash, UPC shake-up Tweet this
This week on MIP: France v EPO spat, Med-El loss Tweet this
Copyright claims up in flames: Evans v John Lewis PLC and Another Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io