Trademark: V
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for V
We do not have any records of a proof of use for V at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of V
Basic Information about V
- Serial Number
- 87788704
- Filing Date
- 07 Feb 2018
- Registration Number
- 6064699
- Registration Date
- 26 May 2020
- Mark Drawing Code
- 3
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of V on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of V anywhere
- V was first used on 22 Mar 2019 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 014 (Jewelry)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 014
- US Codes
- 002; 027; 028; 050
- First use of V anywhere
- V was first used on 22 Jan 2020 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 018 (Leather goods)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 018
- US Codes
- 001; 002; 003; 022; 041
- First use of V anywhere
- V was first used on 12 Jul 2019 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 025 (Clothing)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 025
- US Codes
- 022; 039
Who owns V?
1. SOL IMPORTS LLC BROOKLYN NY
2. Vines Islandwear LLC Brentwood TN
3. Vines Islandwear LLC Brentwood TN
4. Sandal Island LLC St. John TN
Correspondent
- Nancy A. Del Pizzo
- RIVKIN RADLER LLP
- 25 Main Street
- Court Plaza North, Suite 501
Recent News about V
Breaking: UK Supreme Court issues ‘bad faith’ finding in Sky v SkyKick Tweet this
UK Supreme Court sets date for Sky v SkyKick ruling Tweet this
Weekly take: It’s all square on IP in Harris v Trump Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: Lessons to be learned Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco – evergreening and non-use revocation Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: The Court of Appeal reverses copyright infringement decision Tweet this
Behind the case: UK judges provide food for thought in Lidl v Tesco Tweet this
Weekly take: Lidl v Tesco should prompt High Court TM rethink Tweet this
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’ Tweet this
A rare Zambian trademark judgment: ‘Oreo’ v ‘Moreo’s’ Tweet this
Meme Battle: Frogs v Dogs Pepe Coin (PEPE) & (BONK) Price Action Tweet this
Acer Debuts New Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop Tweet this
This week on MIP: Panasonic v Xiaomi, Tupac copyright row Tweet this
Gemini v Genesis: The Winklevii Crypto Exchange Sues Over $1.6 Billion in GBTC Collateral Tweet this
This week on MIP: UPC hires, CoStar v Crexi latest Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco- We need to talk about Copyright Tweet this
Lidl v Tesco: To injunct or not to injunct? Tweet this
Sky v SkyKick reaches UK Supreme Court endgame Tweet this
This week on MIP: Oppo v Nokia clash, UPC shake-up Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io