Trademark: CLARIFY
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for CLARIFY
We do not have any records of a proof of use for CLARIFY at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of CLARIFY
Basic Information about CLARIFY
- Serial Number
- 87979046
- Filing Date
- 25 Aug 2017
- Registration Number
- 5651684
- Registration Date
- 08 Jan 2019
- Mark Drawing Code
- 4
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of CLARIFY on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of CLARIFY anywhere
- CLARIFY was first used on 12 Oct 2018 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 006 (Metal goods)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 006
- US Codes
- 002; 012; 013; 014; 023; 025; 050
- First use of CLARIFY anywhere
- CLARIFY was first used on 09 Oct 2018 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 011 (Environmental control apparatus)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 011
- US Codes
- 013; 021; 023; 031; 034
Who owns CLARIFY?
1. Filtration Technology Corporation Houston TX
2. Filtration Technology Corporation Houston TX
3. Filtration Technology Corporation Houston TX
Correspondent
- Margaret A. Boulware Boulware & Valoir
- 2603 Augusta Drive
- Suite 1350
- Houston, TX 77057
Recent News about CLARIFY
Senator Cassidy Criticizes FDA for Failing to Clarify Device Patent Requirements for Orange Book Listings Tweet this
INTA files amicus brief urging Supreme Court to clarify limits on disgorgement of profits under Lanham Act Tweet this
Supreme Court Rejects Latest Bid to Clarify Patent Eligibility Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 4: Ted Cruz Proposes Bill to Clarify NCCA NIL Rules; GSK Accuses Pfizer of Infringing on its RSV Vaccine Patent; American Axle Claim Upheld in District Court Tweet this
Vidal Exercises Director Review Discretion to Vacate PTAB Institution Denials, Clarify Application of General Plastic Tweet this
Zaxcom Asks Full Federal Circuit to Clarify Court-Created Confusion on Presumption of Nexus Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 21: CNIPA Announces Rapid Trademark Examination Measures, SCOTUS Asked to Clarify Octane Fitness Standard, and Qualcomm Opposes Appleās Petition on Article III Standing Tweet this
Greece: Ruling on ladybird trademarks helps clarify notion of conceptual identity Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io