Trademark: CLARITY
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for CLARITY
We do not have any records of a proof of use for CLARITY at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of CLARITY
Basic Information about CLARITY
- Serial Number
- 88146436
- Filing Date
- 08 Oct 2018
- Registration Number
- 6038001
- Registration Date
- 21 Apr 2020
- Mark Drawing Code
- 4
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of CLARITY on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of CLARITY anywhere
- CLARITY was first used on 30 Jun 2019 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 009 (Electrical and scientific apparatus)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 009
- US Codes
- 021; 023; 026; 036; 038
Who owns CLARITY?
1. Agilent Technologies, Inc. SANTA CLARA CA
2. Agilent Technologies, Inc. Santa Clara CA
3. Agilent Technologies, Inc. Santa Clara CA
Correspondent
- Andrew Roppel
- Holland & Hart LLP
- P.O. Box 8749
- Denver CO 80201-8749
Recent News about CLARITY
High Court Rejects Bid for Clarity on Trademark Confusion Tweet this
Bitwise CIO: U.S. Regulatory Clarity Could Expose Crypto to $20T Financial Advisory Industry Tweet this
Evolving IP Podcast: Bringing Clarity to Innovation Tweet this
Turkey Lays Groundwork for Crypto Clarity with Landmark Regulations Tweet this
Surge in AI legal cases as companies urgently await clarity on copyright issues Tweet this
Middle East regulatory clarity drives crypto industry growth — Binance FZE head Tweet this
Trademarks in Africa: bringing clarity to a complicated picture Tweet this
Coinbase CEO to Americans: Urge reps to vote ‘yes’ on crypto regulatory clarity bills Tweet this
Ripple case is concluding, but the fight for clarity must 'continue' – Brad Garlinghouse Tweet this
Michel Calls Out CAFC for ‘Tremendous Failure’ to Provide Clarity on Eligibility Law Tweet this
Weekly take: INTA’s courting of patent lawyers prompts clarity questions Tweet this
ECJ ruling brings clarity on the interruption of forfeiture periods Tweet this
EU’s MiCA Aims To Bring Greater Clarity To Crypto-Asset Market Tweet this
Clarity over the confusion about the CULTCAMPER trade mark Tweet this
Industry Needs Clarity in Crypto Tax Laws in Union Budget 2022-23 Tweet this
Industry Needs Clarity in Crypto Tax Laws in Union Budget 2022-23 Tweet this
Vidal Agrees Eligibility Needs More Clarity in Senate Judiciary Committee Questioning of Two IP Nominees Tweet this
Get real: India counsel seek clarity on fantasy gaming IP Tweet this
Blockstack Teams Up With Chainlink to Use Algorand-supported Clarity Smart Contract Language Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io