WikiTrademarks - Search, analyse, and monitor trademark applications.

Serial Number

88339545

Filing Date

14 Mar 2019

Registration Number

6583934

Registration Date

07 Dec 2021

Mark Drawing Code

3

Classifications

Declare the trademark use of 101 on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.

First use of 101 anywhere

101 was first used on 18 Dec 2019 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 029 (Meats and processed foods)

First use in commerce

There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.

Status Code

6

International Code

029

US Codes

046

First use of 101 anywhere

101 was first used on 18 Dec 2019 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 035 (Advertising and business)

First use in commerce

There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.

Status Code

6

International Code

035

US Codes

100; 101; 102

First use of 101 anywhere

101 was first used on 18 Dec 2019 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 043 (Hotels and Restaurants)

First use in commerce

There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.

Status Code

6

International Code

043

US Codes

100; 101

Jihun Kim

Bridgeway IP Law Group, PLLC

Suite 800

11350 Random Hills Rd

Return Mail Becomes Latest 101 Petition Denied by SCOTUS Tweet this

SCOTUS Nixes McRO Eligibility Argument in Denying Yet Another Section 101 Cert Petition Tweet this

Checking in With Alice: Section 101 Developments at the Federal Circuit, District Courts, USPTO and Congress Tweet this

AInsights: Google Released a Prompting Guide 101 to Advance GenAI Prompting Skills and Outcomes Tweet this

Another 101 Bites the Dust as High Court Denies Realtime Data Petition Tweet this

Solving the Section 101 Conundrum: Examining Stakeholder Workarounds vs. Legislative Reforms Tweet this

Newman Slams CAFC’s Flawed Eligibility Precedent in Dissent to 101 Loss for Realtime Data Tweet this

Expert Declaration Opposing Section 101 Motion to Dismiss for Patent Invalidity Deemed Not a Written Instrument Tweet this

CareDx/Stanford Tell Justices the Court ‘Needs to Take Another Section 101 Case’ Tweet this

Jim Jordan Letter to Vidal on West Virginia v. EPA Could Implicate USPTO’s Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Guidelines Tweet this

Interactive Wearables is Not the 101 Case That You’ve Been Waiting For Tweet this

With Congress and Courts at Standstill, IPWatchdog LIVE 2022 Panel Says Upcoming ‘Action’ on 101 Will Be at USPTO Tweet this

Eliminating the Jargon: An Alternative Proposal for Section 101 Reform Tweet this

CAFC Snubs Inventor’s Argument that 101 Rejections Violate APA Tweet this

Amicus Brief Backing Inventor’s Eligibility Petition to SCOTUS Says 101 Exceptions Constitute ‘Judicial Legislation’ Tweet this

Clause 8: Phil Warrick on Working with Senator Coons to Fix the Section 101 Mess Tweet this

Blockchain 101 (and Beyond): Recommended Resources for the Crypto-Curious Tweet this

Section 101 on Trial: Understanding How Eligibility Issues Have Fared Before Juries Tweet this

101 Smart Contracts and Decentralized Apps in Ethereum Tweet this

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, December 24: Judge Stark Avoids Responses on Section 101 Questions, EPO Dismisses DABUS Patent Applications Tweet this

Log in to edit this.