WikiTrademarks - Search, analyse, and monitor trademark applications.

Trademark: 101%

Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io

Tweet this

Track updates on 101%

Proof of use for 101%

We do not have any records of a proof of use for 101% at this moment.

Click here to add a proof of use for 101%

Possible trademark infringements of 101%

Basic Information about 101%

Serial Number
90209689
Filing Date
25 Sep 2020
Registration Number
6586210
Registration Date
14 Dec 2021
Mark Drawing Code
4

Classifications

Declare the trademark use of 101% on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.

First use of 101% anywhere
No first use declared yet.
First use in commerce
There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
Status Code
6
International Code
025
US Codes
022; 039

Who owns 101%?

Correspondent

Angel Miguel Munoz, Esq.
Munoz-Lopez & Associates PLLC
1140 Avenue of the Americas
9th Floor

Recent News about 101%

Return Mail Becomes Latest 101 Petition Denied by SCOTUS Tweet this

SCOTUS Nixes McRO Eligibility Argument in Denying Yet Another Section 101 Cert Petition Tweet this

Checking in With Alice: Section 101 Developments at the Federal Circuit, District Courts, USPTO and Congress Tweet this

AInsights: Google Released a Prompting Guide 101 to Advance GenAI Prompting Skills and Outcomes Tweet this

Rainmaking Mistakes 101: Being All Things to All People Tweet this

Patent Filings Roundup: ‘DASH’ Streaming Patents Struck Down Under 101; Samsung IPRs Fall to Fintiv; IP Edge Affiliate Kicks Off New Campaign Tweet this

Another 101 Bites the Dust as High Court Denies Realtime Data Petition Tweet this

Solving the Section 101 Conundrum: Examining Stakeholder Workarounds vs. Legislative Reforms Tweet this

Optimism Blockchain 101: Unlocking The Potential of Layer 2 Scaling Tweet this

Newman Slams CAFC’s Flawed Eligibility Precedent in Dissent to 101 Loss for Realtime Data Tweet this

Expert Declaration Opposing Section 101 Motion to Dismiss for Patent Invalidity Deemed Not a Written Instrument Tweet this

CareDx/Stanford Tell Justices the Court ‘Needs to Take Another Section 101 Case’ Tweet this

Jim Jordan Letter to Vidal on West Virginia v. EPA Could Implicate USPTO’s Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Guidelines Tweet this

Interactive Wearables is Not the 101 Case That You’ve Been Waiting For Tweet this

With Congress and Courts at Standstill, IPWatchdog LIVE 2022 Panel Says Upcoming ‘Action’ on 101 Will Be at USPTO Tweet this

Eliminating the Jargon: An Alternative Proposal for Section 101 Reform Tweet this

CAFC Snubs Inventor’s Argument that 101 Rejections Violate APA Tweet this

Amicus Brief Backing Inventor’s Eligibility Petition to SCOTUS Says 101 Exceptions Constitute ‘Judicial Legislation’ Tweet this

Clause 8: Phil Warrick on Working with Senator Coons to Fix the Section 101 Mess Tweet this

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 4: Judge Michel Urges SCOTUS to Fix Section 101, CAFC Puts Appellate Bar on Notice of Sanctions for COVID-19 Protocol Violations, and Fifth Circuit Modifies Verdict on Trade Secret Misappropriation Tweet this

Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io

Tweet this

Track updates on 101%