WikiTrademarks - Search, analyse, and monitor trademark applications.

Trademark: 101

Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io

Tweet this

Track updates on 101

Proof of use for 101

We do not have any records of a proof of use for 101 at this moment.

Click here to add a proof of use for 101

Possible trademark infringements of 101

Basic Information about 101

Serial Number
90694292
Filing Date
06 May 2021
Registration Number
6717571
Registration Date
03 May 2022
Mark Drawing Code
4

Classifications

Declare the trademark use of 101 on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.

First use of 101 anywhere
101 was first used on 22 Jan 2013 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 028 (Toys and sporting goods)
First use in commerce
There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
Status Code
6
International Code
028
US Codes
022; 023; 038; 050

Who owns 101?

1. Revolution Boards LLC Denver NC

2. Revolution Boards LLC Iron Station NC

3. Revolution Boards LLC Iron Station NC

Correspondent

Revolution Boards LLC
531 Brentwood Rd. STE 242
Denver NC 28037

Recent News about 101

Checking in With Alice: Section 101 Developments at the Federal Circuit, District Courts, USPTO and Congress Tweet this

AInsights: Google Released a Prompting Guide 101 to Advance GenAI Prompting Skills and Outcomes Tweet this

Another 101 Bites the Dust as High Court Denies Realtime Data Petition Tweet this

Solving the Section 101 Conundrum: Examining Stakeholder Workarounds vs. Legislative Reforms Tweet this

Newman Slams CAFC’s Flawed Eligibility Precedent in Dissent to 101 Loss for Realtime Data Tweet this

Expert Declaration Opposing Section 101 Motion to Dismiss for Patent Invalidity Deemed Not a Written Instrument Tweet this

CareDx/Stanford Tell Justices the Court ‘Needs to Take Another Section 101 Case’ Tweet this

Jim Jordan Letter to Vidal on West Virginia v. EPA Could Implicate USPTO’s Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Guidelines Tweet this

Interactive Wearables is Not the 101 Case That You’ve Been Waiting For Tweet this

With Congress and Courts at Standstill, IPWatchdog LIVE 2022 Panel Says Upcoming ‘Action’ on 101 Will Be at USPTO Tweet this

Eliminating the Jargon: An Alternative Proposal for Section 101 Reform Tweet this

CAFC Snubs Inventor’s Argument that 101 Rejections Violate APA Tweet this

Amicus Brief Backing Inventor’s Eligibility Petition to SCOTUS Says 101 Exceptions Constitute ‘Judicial Legislation’ Tweet this

Clause 8: Phil Warrick on Working with Senator Coons to Fix the Section 101 Mess Tweet this

Blockchain 101 (and Beyond): Recommended Resources for the Crypto-Curious Tweet this

Section 101 on Trial: Understanding How Eligibility Issues Have Fared Before Juries Tweet this

101 Smart Contracts and Decentralized Apps in Ethereum Tweet this

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, December 24: Judge Stark Avoids Responses on Section 101 Questions, EPO Dismisses DABUS Patent Applications Tweet this

In Written Responses to Senators’ Questions, Vidal Supports Iancu’s 101 Guidance ‘In Principle’ Tweet this

It’s All in the Hardware: Overcoming 101 Rejections in Computer Networking Technology Classes Tweet this

Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io

Tweet this

Track updates on 101