Trademark: SECTION 101
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for SECTION 101
We do not have any records of a proof of use for SECTION 101 at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of SECTION 101
Basic Information about SECTION 101
- Serial Number
- 90876304
- Filing Date
- 11 Aug 2021
- Registration Number
- 7196956
- Registration Date
- 17 Oct 2023
- Mark Drawing Code
- 4
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of SECTION 101 on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of SECTION 101 anywhere
- SECTION 101 was first used on 17 Sep 2022 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 025 (Clothing)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 025
- US Codes
- 022; 039
Who owns SECTION 101?
1. Madelin Lillian Designs LLC New York NY
2. Madelin Lillian Designs LLC New York NY
3. Madelin Lillian Designs LLC New York NY
Correspondent
- Dennis H. Cavanaugh
- D H CAVANAUGH ASSOCIATES
- 555 FIFTH AVENUE, FL 17
- NEW YORK, NY 10017
Recent News about SECTION 101
SCOTUS Nixes McRO Eligibility Argument in Denying Yet Another Section 101 Cert Petition Tweet this
Checking in With Alice: Section 101 Developments at the Federal Circuit, District Courts, USPTO and Congress Tweet this
Solving the Section 101 Conundrum: Examining Stakeholder Workarounds vs. Legislative Reforms Tweet this
Expert Declaration Opposing Section 101 Motion to Dismiss for Patent Invalidity Deemed Not a Written Instrument Tweet this
CareDx/Stanford Tell Justices the Court ‘Needs to Take Another Section 101 Case’ Tweet this
Jim Jordan Letter to Vidal on West Virginia v. EPA Could Implicate USPTO’s Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Guidelines Tweet this
Eliminating the Jargon: An Alternative Proposal for Section 101 Reform Tweet this
Clause 8: Phil Warrick on Working with Senator Coons to Fix the Section 101 Mess Tweet this
Section 101 on Trial: Understanding How Eligibility Issues Have Fared Before Juries Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, December 24: Judge Stark Avoids Responses on Section 101 Questions, EPO Dismisses DABUS Patent Applications Tweet this
CAFC Affirms District Court Section 101 Dismissal in Patent Infringement Suit Brought Against Samsung/Apple; Newman Dissents Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io