Trademark: CONFUSION
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for CONFUSION
We do not have any records of a proof of use for CONFUSION at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of CONFUSION
Basic Information about CONFUSION
- Serial Number
- 97421686
- Filing Date
- 20 May 2022
- Mark Drawing Code
- 4
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of CONFUSION on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of CONFUSION anywhere
- CONFUSION was first used on 21 Jul 1999 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 009 (Electrical and scientific apparatus)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 009
- US Codes
- 021; 023; 026; 036; 038
- First use of CONFUSION anywhere
- CONFUSION was first used on 21 Jul 1999 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 041 (Education and entertainment)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 041
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 107
Who owns CONFUSION?
1. Mars, Jeffrey C. Snohomish WA
2. Mars, Jeffrey C. Snohomish WA
Correspondent
- Lucas S. Michels
- Ironmark Law Group, PLLC
- 215 N.E. 40th Street, Suite C-3
- Seattle, WA 98105
Recent News about CONFUSION
Germans In The Dark On Digital Euro: Survey Reveals Confusion Over New Currency Tweet this
CAFC Schools TTAB on Likelihood of Confusion Analysis Tweet this
Law School Amici Urge SCOTUS to Grant Kroger Petition on Trademark Confusion and Resolve Circuit Conflict Tweet this
Kroger Asks SCOTUS to Fix Circuit Inconsistencies in Likelihood of Confusion Analysis Tweet this
USPTO, Copyright Office Joint Study on NFTs Could Help Dispel Confusion About IP Ownership in Media Content Underlying Digital Assets Tweet this
Clarity over the confusion about the CULTCAMPER trade mark Tweet this
Cop stops driverless car, driverless car seems to flee, confusion ensues Tweet this
Zaxcom Asks Full Federal Circuit to Clarify Court-Created Confusion on Presumption of Nexus Tweet this
Denmark: No likelihood of confusion between trademarks based on the same fictional character Tweet this
MARBO RED – A case of likelihood of confusion or exploitation of reputation? Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Wednesday, November 23: Senate Democrats Renew Call for TRIPS Waiver, SCOTUS Denies Right of Publicity and Initial Interest Confusion Appeals, and Apple Files Petition for Cert on Licensee Standing to Challenge Patent Validity Tweet this
China SPC confirms mere post-sale confusion can lead to trademark infringement Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io