WikiTrademarks - Search, analyse, and monitor trademark applications.

Trademark: SUPREME COURT

Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io

Tweet this

Track updates on SUPREME COURT

Proof of use for SUPREME COURT

We do not have any records of a proof of use for SUPREME COURT at this moment.

Click here to add a proof of use for SUPREME COURT

Possible trademark infringements of SUPREME COURT

Basic Information about SUPREME COURT

Serial Number
97438246
Filing Date
01 Jun 2022
Mark Drawing Code
4

Classifications

Declare the trademark use of SUPREME COURT on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.

First use of SUPREME COURT anywhere
No first use declared yet.
First use in commerce
There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
Status Code
6
International Code
009
US Codes
021; 023; 026; 036; 038
First use of SUPREME COURT anywhere
No first use declared yet.
First use in commerce
There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
Status Code
6
International Code
016
US Codes
002; 005; 022; 023; 029; 037; 038; 050
First use of SUPREME COURT anywhere
No first use declared yet.
First use in commerce
There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
Status Code
6
International Code
028
US Codes
022; 023; 038; 050
First use of SUPREME COURT anywhere
No first use declared yet.
First use in commerce
There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
Status Code
6
International Code
041
US Codes
100; 101; 107

Who owns SUPREME COURT?

1. The Upper Deck Company Carlsbad CA

2. The Upper Deck Company Carlsbad CA

Correspondent

Samantha C. Markley LOZA & LOZA, LLP
305 N. SECOND AVE., #127
UPLAND, CA 91786
United States

Recent News about SUPREME COURT

Supreme Court must halt TikTok ban, ACLU argues Tweet this

Breaking: UK Supreme Court issues ‘bad faith’ finding in Sky v SkyKick Tweet this

UK Supreme Court sets date for Sky v SkyKick ruling Tweet this

It’s Time for the Supreme Court to Weigh in on Lower Courts’ Improper Use of Rules 56 and 36 Tweet this

INTA files amicus brief urging Supreme Court to clarify limits on disgorgement of profits under Lanham Act Tweet this

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 23: Music Publishers Petition Supreme Court to Review Overturned $1 Billion Copyright Infringement Judgment; Nike Continues Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against ‘Shoe Surgeon’ Tweet this

Supreme Court Grants Real Estate Company’s Trademark Petition Challenging Profits Award Based on Affiliates’ Earnings Tweet this

UK Supreme Court hands directors IP infringement reprieve Tweet this

Back When the Supreme Court Got It Right On IP: Kewanee, 50 Years Later Tweet this

Other Barks and Bites for Friday, May 10: Bipartisan Congress Members Call for GAO Study on March-In Proposal; USPTO Warns Trademark Applicants of Data Leak; Supreme Court Rejects Time Limit on Copyright Damages Tweet this

The Supreme Court rules Amazon did target UK customers with non-UK websites Tweet this

Rader’s Ruminations – Patent Eligibility II: How the Supreme Court Ignored Statute and Revived Its Innovation-Killing Two-Step Tweet this

Greece – Supreme Court – distinctiveness and functionality of shape marks Tweet this

Supreme Court Denies Five IP Petitions on Issues from IPR Joinder to Contributory Trademark Infringement Tweet this

AI in the Dock: B.C. Supreme Court Tackles Fabricated Legal Cases Tweet this

The UK Supreme Court DABUS Decision: The End or Just a Bump in the Road for AI Inventors? Tweet this

The Supreme Court has Rejected Apple's Appeal in an Antitrust case that will affect Apple's lucrative App Store business Tweet this

UK Supreme Court Dismisses DABUS as Inventor Tweet this

Denmark: The Supreme Court finds no infringement of the “TREK” trademark Tweet this

Laser Lessons: Has the Supreme Court Undermined Pioneering Laser Patents? Tweet this

Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io

Tweet this

Track updates on SUPREME COURT