Trademark: SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN.
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN.
Click here to search for trademarks similar to SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN.
Proof of use for SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN.
We do not have any records of a proof of use for SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN. at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN.
Basic Information about SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN.
- Serial Number
- 97542170
- Filing Date
- 10 Aug 2022
- Mark Drawing Code
- 4
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN. on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN. anywhere
- No first use declared yet.
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 035
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 102
Who owns SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN.?
1. Should Have Stayed In LLC Los Angeles CA
2. Should Have Stayed In LLC Los Angeles CA
Correspondent
- Trevor A. Caudle, Esq. Trevor Caudle Law Practice, PC
- 350 Bay Street, #100-363
- San Francisco, CA 94133
- UNITED STATES
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io