Trademark: RE
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for RE
We do not have any records of a proof of use for RE at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of RE
Basic Information about RE
- Serial Number
- 97628912
- Filing Date
- 12 Oct 2022
- Registration Number
- 7496618
- Registration Date
- 03 Sep 2024
- Mark Drawing Code
- 5
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of RE on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of RE anywhere
- RE was first used on 30 Sep 2022 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 035 (Advertising and business)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 035
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 102
- First use of RE anywhere
- RE was first used on 30 Sep 2022 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 036 (Insurance and financial)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 036
- US Codes
- 100; 101; 102
- First use of RE anywhere
- RE was first used on 30 Sep 2022 for the primary classification of goods and services, international, 042 (Computer, scientific & legal)
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 042
- US Codes
- 100; 101
Who owns RE?
1. BRIGHT MLS, LLC NORTH BETHESDA MD
2. BRIGHT MLS, LLC NORTH BETHESDA MD
3. BRIGHT MLS, INC. Rockville MD
4. BRIGHT MLS, INC. Rockville MD
Correspondent
- Amy McFarland ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP
- 1717 K STREET, NW
- WASHINGTON, DC 20006
- UNITED STATES
Recent News about RE
Please Don’t Call Me a ‘Genus’: The High Bar for Section 112 in the Unpredictable Arts as Illustrated by In re Xencor Tweet this
IP Practice Vlogs: PTAs, PTEs and Terminal Disclaimer Practice under In re Cellect Tweet this
A Comment on In re Cellect: The Patent Bar Must Push for Eliminating ODP Altogether, Not Interpreting it More Favorably Tweet this
In re Smith: The Federal Circuit Jumps the Shark Tweet this
Call for Amici: Whatever You Think of In re Killian, Patent Owners Deserve Clarity Tweet this
In re Killian: Harvey the Rabbit Comes to the Federal Circuit Tweet this
Trademark case: In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd., USA Tweet this
Trademark case: In re Steve Elster, USA Tweet this
In re Surgisil: Boon, Burden, or Mixed Bag for Patent Applicants and Patentees? Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io