Trademark: 101
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at wikitrademarks.io
Mark Identification
Proof of use for 101
We do not have any records of a proof of use for 101 at this moment.
Possible trademark infringements of 101
Basic Information about 101
- Serial Number
- 98759609
- Filing Date
- 19 Sep 2024
Classifications
Declare the trademark use of 101 on the blockchain with WikiTrademarks.io.
- First use of 101 anywhere
- No first use declared yet.
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 032
- US Codes
- 045; 046; 048
- First use of 101 anywhere
- No first use declared yet.
- First use in commerce
- There is no first use of this trademark in commerce detected yet.
- Status Code
- 6
- International Code
- 005
- US Codes
- 005; 006; 018; 044; 046; 051; 052
Who owns 101?
1. Magnum Worldwide Holdings Inc. Surrey, BC
Correspondent
- Alex Patel Patel & Almeida, P. C.
- 20700 Ventura Blvd., Suite #235
- Woodland Hills, CA 91364
- United States
Recent News about 101
SCOTUS Nixes McRO Eligibility Argument in Denying Yet Another Section 101 Cert Petition Tweet this
Checking in With Alice: Section 101 Developments at the Federal Circuit, District Courts, USPTO and Congress Tweet this
AInsights: Google Released a Prompting Guide 101 to Advance GenAI Prompting Skills and Outcomes Tweet this
Another 101 Bites the Dust as High Court Denies Realtime Data Petition Tweet this
Solving the Section 101 Conundrum: Examining Stakeholder Workarounds vs. Legislative Reforms Tweet this
Newman Slams CAFC’s Flawed Eligibility Precedent in Dissent to 101 Loss for Realtime Data Tweet this
Expert Declaration Opposing Section 101 Motion to Dismiss for Patent Invalidity Deemed Not a Written Instrument Tweet this
CareDx/Stanford Tell Justices the Court ‘Needs to Take Another Section 101 Case’ Tweet this
Jim Jordan Letter to Vidal on West Virginia v. EPA Could Implicate USPTO’s Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Guidelines Tweet this
Interactive Wearables is Not the 101 Case That You’ve Been Waiting For Tweet this
With Congress and Courts at Standstill, IPWatchdog LIVE 2022 Panel Says Upcoming ‘Action’ on 101 Will Be at USPTO Tweet this
Eliminating the Jargon: An Alternative Proposal for Section 101 Reform Tweet this
CAFC Snubs Inventor’s Argument that 101 Rejections Violate APA Tweet this
Amicus Brief Backing Inventor’s Eligibility Petition to SCOTUS Says 101 Exceptions Constitute ‘Judicial Legislation’ Tweet this
Clause 8: Phil Warrick on Working with Senator Coons to Fix the Section 101 Mess Tweet this
Blockchain 101 (and Beyond): Recommended Resources for the Crypto-Curious Tweet this
Section 101 on Trial: Understanding How Eligibility Issues Have Fared Before Juries Tweet this
101 Smart Contracts and Decentralized Apps in Ethereum Tweet this
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, December 24: Judge Stark Avoids Responses on Section 101 Questions, EPO Dismisses DABUS Patent Applications Tweet this
In Written Responses to Senators’ Questions, Vidal Supports Iancu’s 101 Guidance ‘In Principle’ Tweet this
Put your brand on the blockchain and timestamp its proof of existence at Wikitrademarks.io